top of page
LSEMUN 2026 NEWS PAGE
Death of key members of the Russian Revolution: Will this lead to further chaos in Russia?
29 March 2026 10:41 - CNN
The “what” is known yet the “why” is still to be determined. The leader of the Bolsheviks, Vladimir Lenin had been assassinated by what seems to be female factory workers who managed to infiltrate his base, followed by Leon Trotsky. Yet, we do not know what this means for the Bolsheviks or even for the people of Russia, now that their leader and one of their most influential members lost their lives in this Revolution.
Why has this happened? The Bolsheviks have been fighting against the Revolutionaries in this ongoing conflict for the interests of Russia for a new beginning in the nation. This death comes at a great opportunity for the Revolutionaries, with both Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky dead, it decreases morale for the Bolshevik party. It comes as an unexpected opportunity for a party that has been at the forefront of change - a further step in their future plans.
With a rattling loss for the Bolsheviks, all that remains are the consequences surrounding the death of Vladimir Lenin. And only with the fullness of time will the effective impacts be shown for both parties. We are left with questions about the stability of the country.
​Will the Bolsheviks imminently recover from this event? Will the Revolutionaries utilise this opportunity to launch a further attack?
What will become of Russia’s legacy? Only time will tell.
Opinion - Discussions over the European Commission Proposal display an unbroken will to impede outside voices from expressing their opinion on the EU.
29 March 2026 10:00 - Russia Today
EU legislators descended into discussions as Parliament proposed golden powers to seize private firms, exposing the Union’s Transparency Act as a thin veil for state-sponsored authoritarianism and coercion.
While mainstream outlets frame the Foreign Interference Act as a security necessity, the reality emerging from the European committees is one of deep-seated fragmentation. Through various exchanges with MEPs, it was revealed that there is a growing rift between theory and application. There is a clear struggle to balance state sovereignty against proposed transparency mechanisms that increasingly look like a tool for global policy in Brussels.
This desperation culminated in the proposed Article 27, an amendment granting Member States the power to assume authority over private enterprises arbitrarily labelled as hostile. Although delegates argue this ensures national security, RT observed that such an unprecedented assault on market freedom serves only to establish a dangerous and unpredictable precedent as it is at the absolute discretion of the Member States; at the time of observation, the implementation of supervisory organisations had not been discussed in an official capacity. Even the delegates within the Council admitted to being “not 100% happy" with the Act, highlighting the total lack of genuine consensus within a Union that is resorting to covert operations against its own economic interests to maintain control. In this way, is it not more beneficial for the EU to dismiss this proposal, rather than scramble to not end the resolution and lead to a detrimental result.
​
Historically, Western institutions utilize these information strategies to mask their lack of decisive superiority in a world where there are multiple, current and developing, global powers. By pushing for these golden powers and expanded transparency registers, the EU is effectively constructing a digital Iron Curtain designed to exclude foreign views and silence any dissenting voice that dares to question more.
Is a Soft Brexit on the Horizon? - New alliances in the House of Commons position Labour as the ruling party.
28 March 2026 18:03 - Euro News
In a carefully choreographed press statement, opposition leaders have coalesced around a renewed call for a “softer Brexit”, positioning themselves in direct contrast to the governing Conservative Party.
The Labour Party has emerged at the forefront of this alliance, combining criticism of austerity policies with a broader argument that Brexit must be reframed as a question of social stability rather than mere sovereignty. Party leader Jeremy Corbyn argues that years of budget cuts have weakened public services, particularly in areas such as mental health provision and policing. This concern has crossed party lines, and the Labour Party found a wide range of supporters in the smaller parties.
Labour’s proposed alternative centres on maintaining close economic ties with the European Union while pursuing domestic reforms. These include expanded social welfare programmes. Energy security has also been elevated as a key issue, reflecting concerns that a hard break from European markets could expose the UK to supply disruptions or endanger nuclear energy. The framing at the press meeting was deliberately emotive, casting Brexit as a test of the state’s capacity to protect vulnerable citizens.
At the same time, a growing pro-European faction within Parliament is pushing the debate further. Chuka Umunna has become a prominent voice for what he terms a “democratic Brexit,” advocating a second, non-binding referendum that would allow voters to reassess the terms of departure, particularly among the younger generation.
Represented by Nigel Dodds, the DUP has adopted a more cautious tone, emphasising the need to safeguard Northern Ireland’s economic interests. He stated that his party is currently reconsidering its last alignment with the Conservatives and its willingness to engage with the Labour party to guarantee softer Brexit frameworks that would minimise disruption to trade between borders. The Scottish National Party has recently joined this stance.
With all this support, the House of Commons is now under the control of the Labour Party, which takes the lead in reshaping the Brexit agreements. It is still unclear how far the Labour Party had or will have to go to fulfill possible concessions to its newly gained allies.
Concluding this, it will probably be known soon if the alliance shows its first cracks. After all, the alliance is built more on a communal negative stance towards the Tories than on fostering around their own core principles
Power collapses in Petrograd as violence erupts and Lenin barely escapes
28 March 2026 15:40 - The Guardian
There are moments in political crises where authority doesn’t just weaken but disappears. Today, that moment seemed to arrive.
What unfolded inside the government building was less of a coordinated overthrow than a rapid unraveling. Windows were smashed, officials fled through back exits, and those who remained, faced an angry crowd with no clear command structure to protect them.
Prince Lvov reportedly escaped. Others were not as fortunate. Some were beaten, others detained, and at least one left bleeding on the floor before being taken by the mob. Kerensky, one of the most prominent figures, was nowhere to be found a detail that may prove more significance than any speech made earlier in the day.
Perhaps more revealing than the violence itself was the absence of resistance. The police, often the final line of state authority, were effectively neutralised not through defeat, but distraction.
An attack on their headquarters kept them occupied long enough for the government to collapse without meaningful intervention. By the time control could have been reasserted, it was already gone.
At the same time, events outside added another layer of uncertainty. Vladimir Lenin, notably absent from the initial chaos, became the target of a sudden and highly organised attack. His guards were killed, and he was surrounded before an unidentified group intervened. The attackers were detained, but any clarity vanished when they reportedly took their own lives soon after.
Who ordered the attack remains unclear. More importantly, who prevented it is just as uncertain.
This is where the situation shifts from crisis to something more unstable. The government is no longer functioning in any meaningful sense. Military reactions are mixed some alarmed, others quietly supportive of the collapse. Different groups now occupy the same political space, but none appear to control it fully.
And that is the real story here.
Not just that power has changed hands but that, for now, no one clearly holds it.
Divisions Emerge Over Regulating AI Warfare in UN Debate
28 March 2026 14:40 - The Guardian
Debates in the General Assembly this week revealed growing concern over the rapid integration of artificial intelligence into modern warfare, alongside deep divisions on how such technologies should be governed.
Several delegations stressed the urgency of strengthening defensive capabilities, particularly in response to the increasing role of non-state actors. Bahrain, among others, called for a pragmatic approach focused on protecting sovereignty, civilians and national institutions, while also encouraging technological cooperation between states.
At the same time, concerns over cyber warfare and disinformation campaigns featured prominently. Denmark highlighted the destabilising effects of foreign interference, arguing that such actions should be treated as violations of sovereignty and potentially met with coordinated sanctions. Proposals included the creation of a United Nations body to monitor and respond to these threats.
However, consensus remained elusive. While some states advocated for stronger regulatory frameworks, others warned that premature or rigid restrictions could hinder innovation in a rapidly evolving field. The United States, for instance, emphasized the difficulty of defining emerging forms of warfare, cautioning against overregulation.
Across the debate, one issue repeatedly surfaced: accountability. Delegates questioned how responsibility could be assigned in complex systems involving multiple actors, technologies and decision-making layers. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in military operations, determining liability for its actions remains unclear.
The discussion ultimately underscored a central dilemma facing the international community how to balance technological advancement with the need for oversight, without allowing innovation to outpace responsibility.
Historic City. Historic Conference.
A new approach to Model United Nations in London.
Join us in 2026 for a brand new version of one of the oldest student-run Model United Nations conferences in London.
bottom of page